Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 1-6 , January 2009

Comparison of current density viability imaging at rest with FDG-PET in patients after myocardial infarction

  • M. Goernig

      Affiliations

    • Clinic of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +49 3641 9324529; fax: +49 3641 9324177.
  • ,
  • J. Haueisen

      Affiliations

    • Biomagnetic Center, Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital of Jena, Jena, Germany
    • University of Technology Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany
  • ,
  • J. Schreiber

      Affiliations

    • Biomagnetic Center, Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital of Jena, Jena, Germany
  • ,
  • U. Leder

      Affiliations

    • Clinic of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany
  • ,
  • H. Hänninen

      Affiliations

    • Engineering Centre, BioMag Laboratory, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • T. Mäkelä

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
  • ,
  • P. Takala

      Affiliations

    • Engineering Centre, BioMag Laboratory, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
    • Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
  • ,
  • J. Nenonen

      Affiliations

    • Engineering Centre, BioMag Laboratory, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
    • Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
  • ,
  • K. Lauerma

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • J. Knuuti

      Affiliations

    • Turku PET Centre, Turku, Finland
  • ,
  • M. Mäkijärvi

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • L. Toivonen

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  • ,
  • T. Katila

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland

Received 15 May 2008 ,Accepted 22 September 2008.

References 

  1. Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, Ferrari R, Rahimtoola SH. Hibernating myocardium: diagnosis and patient outcomes. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2007;32:375–410
  2. Camici PG, Prasad SK, Rimoldi OE. Stunning, hibernation, and assessment of myocardial viability. Circulation. 2008;117:103–114
  3. Janse MJ, Wit AL. Electrophysiological mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias resulting from myocardial ischemia and infarction. Physiol Rev. 1989;69:1049–1069
  4. Lant J, Stroink G, ten Voorde B, Horacek BM, Montague TJ. Complementary nature of electrocardiographic and magnetocardiographic data in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Electrocardiol. 1990;23:315–322
  5. Liehr M, Haueisen J, Goernig M, Seidel P, Nenonen J, Katila T. Vortex shaped current sources in a physical torso phantom. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005;33:240–247
  6. Hartiala J, Knuuti J. Imaging of heart by MRI and PET. Ann Med. 1995;27:35–45
  7. Lauerma K, Niemi P, Hänninen H, Janatuinen T, Voipio-Pulkki L, Knuuti J, et al. Multimodality MR imaging assessment of myocardial viability: combination of first-pass and late contrast enhancement to wall motion dynamics and comparison with FDG-PET. Radiology. 2000;217:729–736
  8. Haueisn J, Schreiber J, Brauer H, Knösche TR. The dependence of the inverse solution accuracy in magnetocardiography on the boundary element discretization. IEEE Trans Mag. 2002;38:1045–1048
  9. Gerber BL, Ordoubadi FF, Wijns W, Vanoverschelde JLJ, Knuuti MJ, Janier M, et al. Positron emission tomography using 18-F-fluoro-deoxyglucose and euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp: optimal criteria for the prediction of recovery of post-ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction. Results from the European Community Concerted Action Multicenter study on use of 18-F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the detection of myocardial viability. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1691–1701
  10. Fuchs M, Wagner M, Köhler T, Wischmann HA. Linear and nonlinear current density reconstruction. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;16:267–295
  11. Haueisen J, Tuch DS, Ramon C, Schimpf PH, Wedeen VJ, George JS, et al. The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG. Neuroimage. 2002;15:159–166
  12. Ramon C, Schmpf PH, Wang Y, Haueisen J, Ishimaru A. The effect of volume currents due to myocardial anisotropy on body surface potentials. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:1167–1184
  13. Kobayashi K, Uchikawa Y. Estimation of multiple sources using spatio-temporal data on a three-dimensional measurement of MEG. IEEE Trans Mag. 2001;37:2915–2917

PII: S0895-6111(08)00096-7

doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2008.09.002

Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 1-6 , January 2009