Segmentation of kidneys using a new active shape model generation technique based on non-rigid image registration

Reference 

1. Pohle R, Tönnies KD. A new approach for model-based adaptive region growing in medical image analysis. In:  Skarbek W editors. CAIP, vol. 2124 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer; 2001;p. 238–246
2. Kobashi L, Shapiro M. Knowledge-based organ identification from CT images. In:  Loew M editors. Proceedings of SPIE on medical imaging. vol. 1652:1992;p. 544–554
3. Tsagaan B, Shimizu A, Kobatake H, Kunihisa M, Hanzawa Y. Segmentation of kidney by using a deformable model. In: ICIP: international conference on image processing, Part 3. 2001;p. 1059–1062
4. Tsagaan B, Shimizu A, Kobatake H, Miyakawa K. An automated segmentation method of kidney using statistical information. In: MICCAI ‘02: proceedings of the 5th international conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—Part I. 2002;p. 556–563
5. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, Graham J. Active shape models—their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 1995;61(1):38–59
6. Davies R, Twining C, Cootes T, Waterton J, Taylor C. 3D statistical shape models using direct optimisation of description length. In: European conference on computer vision, vol. 3; 2002. p. 3–20.
7. Davies R, Twining C, Cootes T, Waterton J, Taylor C. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modelling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2002;21(5):525–537
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Heimann T, Wolf I, Williams T, Meinzer H. 3D active shape models using gradient descent optimization of description length. In:  Christensen GE,  Sonka M editor. IPMI, vol. 3565 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer; 2005;p. 566–577
9. Heimann T, Wolf I, Williams T, Meinzer H. Optimal landmark distributions for statistical shape model construction. In:  Reinhardt J,  Pluim J editor. Proceedings of SPIE on medical imaging. vol. 6144:2006;p. 518–528
10. Modersitzki J. Numerical methods for image registration. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004;
11. Hermosillo G, Chefd’Hotel C, Faugeras O. Variational methods for multimodal image matching. International Journal of Computer Vision. 2002;50(3):329–343
12. Clarenz U, Droske M, Henn S, Rumpf M, Witsch K. Computational methods for nonlinear image registration. In:  Scherzer O editors. Mathematical method for registration and applications to medical imaging, mathematics in industry. vol. 10:2006;p. 81–101
13. Fischer B, Modersitzki J. A unified approach to fast image registration and a new curvature based registration technique. Linear Algebra and its Applications. 2004;380:107–124
14. Thodberg HH. Minimum description length shape and appearance models. In:  Taylor CJ,  Noble JA editor. IPMI, vol. 2732 of lecture notes in computer science. Springer; 2003;p. 51–62
15. Floater MS, Hormann K. Surface parameterization: a tutorial and survey. In:  Dodgson NA,  Floater MS,  Sabin MA editor. Advances in multiresolution for geometric modelling. Springer-Verlag; 2005;p. 157–186
16. Gu X, Wang Y, Chan T, Thompson P, Yau S. Genus zero surface conformal mapping and its application to brain surface mapping. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2004;23(8):949–958
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
17. Sethian JA. Level set methods and fast marching methods. Cambridge University Press; 1999;
18. William EL, Harvey EC. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Computer Graphics. 1987;21(4):163–169
19. Cootes TF, Hill A, Taylor CJ, Haslam J. The use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images. Image and Vision Computing. 1994;12(6):355–366
20. Cootes T, Taylor C. Statistical models of appearance for computer vision. Tech. Rep., Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, University of Manchester; March 2004.
21. Heimann T, Oguz I, Wolf I, Styner M, Meinzer H. Implementing the automatic generation of 3D statistical shape models with ITK. In: IJ-MICCAI open science workshop; 2006.