A comparison of two methods for the segmentation of masses in the digital mammograms

References 

1. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2005–2006; 2006. p. 1–28.
2. Ball JE, Bruce LM. Digital mammographic computer aided diagnosis using adaptive level set segmentation. EMBS Proc IEEE. 2007;4973–4978
3. Maskery SM, Zhang Y, Jodan RM, Hu H, Hook JA, Craig D, et al. Co-occurrence analysis for discovery of novel breast cancer pathology patterns. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed. 2006;10(3):497–503
4. Yapa RD, Harada K. Breast skin-line estimation and breast segmentation in mammograms using fast marching method. Int J Biol Med Sci. 2008;3(1):54–62
5. Jelen L, Fevens T, Krzyzak A. Classification of breast cancer malignancy using cytological images of fine needle aspiration biopsies. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci. 2008;18(1):75–83
6. Soria D, Garibaldi JM, Biganzoli E, Ellis IO. A comparison of three different methods for classification of breast cancer data. In: 7th international conference IEEE computer society. 2008;p. 619–624
7. Boyle P, Ferly J. Cancer incidence and morality in Europe. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(3):481–488
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Climent J, Sanfeliu A. Visually significant dynamics for watershed segmentation. IEEE Int Conf Pattern Recognit. 2006;
9. Deka B, Ghosh D. Watershed segmentation for medical ultrasound images. IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybernet. 2006;3186–3191
10. Bick U, Giger ML, Schmidt RA, Nishikawa RM, Wolverton DE, Doi K. Automatic segmentation of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995;2:1–9
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (4076 KB)
    • CrossRef
11. American College of Radiology . ACR BI-RADS-mammography. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. 4th ed.. Reston, VA: Amer. Coll. Radiol.; 2003;
12. Timp S, Karssemeijer N. A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography. Med Phys. 2004;31(5):958–971
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Mendez AJ, Tahoces PG, Lado MJ, Sauto M, Correa JL, Vidal JJ. Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1996;49:253–262
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (4420 KB)
    • CrossRef
14. Wirth MA, Stapinski A. Segmentation of breast region in mammograms using snakes. Int Conf Comput Robot Vision. 2004;385–392
15. Wirth MA, Lyon J, Nikitenko D, Stapinski A. A fuzzy approach to segmenting the breast region in mammograms. IEEE Proc NAFIPS Fuzzy Inform. 2004;1:474–479
16. Malladi R, Sethian JA, Vemuri BC. Shape modeling with front propagation: a level set approach. IEEE Trans PAMI. 1995;17:158–175
17. Sethian JA. Level set methods: evolving interfaces in geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision and material science. UK: Cambridge University; 1996;
18. Hua LI, Elmoataz AL, Fadilia J, Ruana Su. An improved image segmentation approach based on level set and mathematical morphology. France: Dept. of Electronics & Inf. Eng., Huazhong Univ. of Science & Tech.; 2003;
19. Vicent L, Soille P. Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1991;13(6):583–598
    • CrossRef
20. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital Image processing. 2nd ed.. 2003;