Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Volume 34, Issue 7 , Pages 553-562 , October 2010

Effective incorporating spatial information in a mutual information based 3D–2D registration of a CT volume to X-ray images

  • Guoyan Zheng

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationTel.: +41 31 631 5956; fax: +41 31 631 5960.

Received 3 August 2009 ,Revised 28 December 2009 ,Accepted 23 March 2010.

References 

  1. Hamadeh A, Lavallée S, Cinquin P. Automated 3-dimensional computer tomographic and fluoroscopic image registration. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3:1453–1462
  2. Tomaževič D, Likar B, Slivnik T, Pernuš F. 3-D/2-D registration of CT and MR to X-ray images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:1101–1109
  3. Gueziec A, Kazanzides P, Williamson B, Taylor RH. Anatomy-based registration of CT-scan and intraoperative X-ray images for guiding a surgical robot. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17:715–728
  4. Brown LMG, Boult TE. Registration of planar film radiographs with computed tomography. In: Proceedings of MMBIA’96. 1996;p. 42–51
  5. Weese J, Buzug TM, Lorenz C, Fassnacht C. An approach to 2D/3D registration of a vertebra in 2D X-ray fluoroscopies with 3D CT images. In: Proceedings of the 1st joint conference on computer vision, virtual reality and robotics in medicine and medical robotics and computer-assisted surgery (CVRMed-MRCAS’97), LNCS 1205. Springer; 1997;p. 715–728
  6. Penney GP, Weese J, Little JA, Desmedt P, Hill DL, Hawkes DJ. A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D–3-D medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17:586–595
  7. LaRose D, Hayouth J, Kanade T. Transgraph: interactive intensity-based 2D/3D registration of X-ray and CT data. Proc SPIE Med Imaging: Image Process. 2000;3979:385–396
  8. Zollei L, Grimson E, Nobash A, Wells W. 2D–3D rigid registration of X-ray fluoroscopy and CT images using mutual information and sparsely sampled histogram estimators. In: Proceedings of 2001 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR2001), Part II. 2001;p. 696–703
  9. Russakoff DB, Rohlfing T, Maurer CR. Fast intensity-based 2D–3D image registration of clinical data using light fields. In: Proceedings of ICCV’03. 2003;p. 416–422
  10. Livyatan H, Yaniv Z, Joskowicz L. Gradient-based 2-D/3-D rigid registration of fluoroscopic X-ray to CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:1395–1406
  11. Birkfellner W, Wirth J, Burgstaller W, Baumann B, Staedele H, Hammer B, et al. A faster method for 3D/2D image registration – a simulation study. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:2665–2679
  12. Russakoff DB, Rohlfing T, Adler JR, Maurer CR. Intensity-based 2D/3D spine image registration incorporating a single fiducial marker. Acad Radio. 2004;12:37–50
  13. van de Kraats EB, Penney GP, Tomaževič D, van Walsum T, Niessen WJ. Standardized evaluation methodology for 2-D–3-D registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005;24:1177–1189
  14. Rohlfing T, Russakoff DB, Denzler J, Mori K, Maurer CR. Progressive attenuation fields: fast 2D–3D registration without precomputation. Med Phys. 2005;32:2870–2880
  15. Russakoff DB, Rohlfing T, Mori K, Rueckert D, Adler JR, Maurer CR. Fast generation of digitally reconstructed radiographs using attenuation fields with application to 2D–3D image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005;24:1441–1454
  16. Jonić S, Thévenaz P, Zheng G, Nolte L-P, Unser M. An optimized spline-based registration of a 3D CT to a set of C-arm images. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2006;doi: 10.1155/IJBI/2006/47197
  17. Zhang X, Zheng G, Langlotz F, Nolte L-P. Assessment of spline-based 2D–3D registration for image-guided spine surgery. Minim Invasiv Ther. 2006;15:193–199
  18. Künzler T, Grezdo J, Bogner J, Birkfellner W, Georg D. Registration of DRRs and portal images for verification of stereotactic body radiotherapy: a feasibility study in lung cancer treatment. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:2157–2170
  19. Chen X, Varley MR, Shark L-K, Shentall GS, Kirby MC. A computationally efficient method for automatic registration of orthogonal X-ray images with volumetric CT. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:967–983
  20. Aouadi S, Sarry L. Accurate and precise 2D–3D registration based on X-ray intensity. Comput Vis Image Und. 2008;110:134–151
  21. Blendea S, Eckman K, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ, DiGioia AM. Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching. Comput Aided Surg. 2005;10:37–43
  22. Jaramaz B, Eckman K. 2D/3D registration for measurement of implant alignment after total hip replacement. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI 2006), LNCS 4191. 2006;p. 653–661
  23. Penney GP, Edwards PJ, Hipwell JH, Slomczykowski M, Revie I, Hawkes DJ. Postoperative calculation of acetabular cup position using 2D–3D registration. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54:342–1348
  24. Wells W, Viola P, Atsumi H, Nakajima S, Kikinis R. Multi-model volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal. 1996;1:35–51
  25. Maes F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D, Marchal G, Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997;16:187–198
  26. Pluim JP, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. Mutual information based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22:986–1004
  27. Pluim JP, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19:809–814
  28. Rueckert D, Clarkson MJ, Hill DL, Hawkes DJ. Non-rigid registration using higher-order mutual information. SPIE Med Imaging: Image Process. 2000;3979:438–447
  29. Sabuncu MR, Ramadge PJ. Spatial information in entropy-based image registration. In: Proceedings of WBIR’03, LNCS 2717. Springer; 2003;p. 132–141
  30. Russakff DB, Tomasi C, Rohlfing T, Maurer CR. Image similarity using mutual information of regions. In: ECCV’04, LNCS 3023. Springer; 2004;p. 596–607
  31. Gan R, Chung ACS. Multi-dimensional mutual information based robust image registration using maximum distance-gradient-magnitude. In: IPMI’05, LNCS 3565. Springer; 2005;p. 210–221
  32. Barber D, Agakov FV. The IM algorithm: a variational approach to information maximization. In: Proceedings of NIPS’03, vol. 16. MIT Press; 2003;
  33. Li SZ. Markov random field modeling in computer vision. Springer-Verlag; 1995;
  34. Roche A, Malandain G, Ayache N. Unifying maximum likelihood approaches in medical image. Int J Imag Syst Tech. 2000;11:71–80
  35. Hofstetter R, Slomczykowski M, Sati M, Nolte L-P. Fluoroscopy as an imaging means for computer-assisted surgical navigation. Comput Aided Surg. 1999;4:65–76
  36. Kiefer H. Differences and opportunities of THA in the USA, Asia and Europe. In:  Chang J-D,  Billau K editor. Ceramics in orthopaedics, the Proceedings of the 12th BIOLOX® symposium on bioceramics and alternative bearings in joint arthroplasty. Springer; 2007;p. 3–8
  37. Ali Kahn MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds IS. Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg-Br. 1981;63B:214–218
  38. McColllum DE, Gray WJG. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;261:159–170
  39. Bader RJ, Steinhauser E, Willmann G, Gradinger R. The effects of implant position, design and wear on the range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2001;11:80–90
  40. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocation after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg-Am. 1978;60:217–220
  41. Patil S, Bergula A, Chen PC, Colwell CW, D’Lima DD. Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation. J Bone Joint Surg-Am. 2003;85:56–63
  42. Widmer KH. Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthoop. 2007;31(Suppl 1):S29–S33
  43. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg-Br. 1993;75B:228–232
  44. Thomas T, Handel M, Herold T, Perlick L, Paetzel C, Grifka J. Position of the acetabular cup-accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:294–300
  45. Pradhan R. Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg-Br. 1999;81-B:431–435
  46. Della Valle CJ, Kaplan K, Jazrawi A, Ahmed S, Jaffe WL. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flanged, cemented all-polyethylene acetabular component: evaluation at a minimum of 20 years. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:23–26
  47. Zheng G, Steppacher S, Zhang X, Tannast M. Precise estimation of postoperative cup alignment from single standard X-ray radiograph with gonadal shielding. In: Proceedings of 2007 international conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention (MICCAI 2007), Part II, LNCS 4792. Springer; 2007. p. 951–9.
  48. Zheng G, Marx A, Langlotz U, Widmer KH, Buttaro M, Nolte LP. A hybrid CT-free navigation system for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2002;7:129–145
  49. Steppacher S, Tannast M, Zheng G, Zhang X, Kowal J, Murphy SB. Validation of a new method for determination of cup orientation in THA. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:1583–1588

☆ A preliminary version of this paper was presented in the 11th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2008), which was held in New York, USA, September 6–10, 2008.

PII: S0895-6111(10)00039-X

doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2010.03.004

Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Volume 34, Issue 7 , Pages 553-562 , October 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution